We're live on Product Hunt!Support us
ColorArchive

A curated color library with 5,000+ algorithmically generated colors. Browse, search, save favorites, and export palette tokens — no account required.

CollectionsFamiliesBrandsRegionsJournalNotesGuidesFree ResourcesConvertColorblindAboutSupportUpdates
Ready for static export
Privacy·Terms·Refunds·Cookies·Commerce Disclosure
colorarchive.org · © 2026 ColorArchive
Skip to content
ColorArchive
ProLog in
ArchiveAll ColorsCollections
Cobalt Tone Soft#768DBC
Blush Silk Soft#C992AD
VS

Cobalt Tone Soft vs Blush Silk Soft

A detailed comparison of #768DBC and #C992AD — triadic range colors

Contrast & Accessibility

1.3:1contrast ratio
✗ AA Normal✗ AA Large✗ AAA Normal✗ AAA Large
Text on Cobalt Tone Soft
Text on Blush Silk Soft

Color Properties

#768DBC
HEX
#C992AD
rgb(118, 141, 188)
RGB
rgb(201, 146, 173)
hsl(220, 34%, 60%)
HSL
hsl(330, 34%, 68%)
220°
Hue
330°
34%
Saturation
34%
60%
Lightness
68%
Blue
Family
Pink
Hue Diff
110\u00B0 — Triadic range

Gradient Blend

background: linear-gradient(to right, #768DBC, #C992AD);

Using These Colors Together

With a contrast ratio of 1.3:1, this pair does not meet WCAG guidelines for text. Use these colors as adjacent blocks, gradients, or decorative accents rather than text-on-background pairings.

These colors have a 110\u00B0 hue difference, making them triadic range. They offer moderate contrast — versatile for card designs, illustrations, and layered UI compositions.

Cobalt Tone Soft
view_detail →
Blush Silk Soft
view_detail →

Related Comparisons

Cobalt Tone Soft vs Apricot Tone Soft
#768DBC · #BCA576
Blush Silk Soft vs Jade Silk Soft
#C992AD · #92C9AD
Amethyst Tone Soft vs Blush Silk Soft
#7C76BC · #C992AD
Cobalt Tone Soft vs Merlot Silk Soft
#768DBC · #C9929B
Amethyst Tone Soft vs Merlot Silk Soft
#7C76BC · #C9929B